Melanotan II
Melanotan II is an unapproved, injectable peptide promoted for "sunless tanning" through direct melanocyte stimulation — a substance with documented, serious adverse effects (from priapism to melanoma cases), banned or flagged by health agencies in multiple countries. This entry is deliberately written with an emphasis on risk, because the evidence of real harm here is far more solid than the evidence for any safe use.
Number of studies
3
Safety
Requires caution
Time to effects
Dose-dependent skin darkening was described in the Phase I pilot study after several days to weeks of regular injections — but this is not information about safe use, only a description of a pharmacological effect noted in a very small study (3 people) of a substance never registered for this purpose.
Monthly cost
ok. 200–500 zł/miesiąc przy typowych protokołach stosowanych przez użytkowników forów
Price in Poland
ok. 100–250 zł za fiolkę w nieregulowanej sprzedaży internetowej
Who it's for
Cena nie jest wskaźnikiem jakości, czystości ani bezpieczeństwa — niezależne analizy laboratoryjne fiolek z tego rynku wielokrotnie wykazywały zanieczyszczenia i rozbieżności z etykietą niezależnie od ceny czy renomy sprzedawcy.
Indicative prices for the Polish market — we don't point to specific retailers; the real price depends on the manufacturer, form and place of purchase.
Table of contents
TL;DR
Melanotan II is an unapproved, injectable peptide promoted for "sunless tanning" through direct melanocyte stimulation — a substance with documented, serious adverse effects (from priapism to melanoma cases), banned or flagged by health agencies in multiple countries. This entry is deliberately written with an emphasis on risk, because the evidence of real harm here is far more solid than the evidence for any safe use.
- →Confirmed in a Phase I pilot study: dose-dependent skin darkening independent of UV exposure
- →Historical, never realized research rationale: potential photoprotection in very fair-skinned people at high skin cancer risk
- →From an editorial standpoint: no benefit was identified whose documented magnitude would outweigh the documented risk given the current state of knowledge and lack of market regulation
| What it is | A synthetic, non-selective melanocortin receptor agonist (MC1R, MC3R, MC4R, MC5R) |
|---|---|
| Original research goal | Photoprotection against skin cancer via UV-independent skin darkening (never registered) |
| Related approved drug | Afamelanotide (Scenesse) — a selective MC1R agonist, approved for erythropoietic protoporphyria; a completely different safety profile |
| Regulatory status | Not approved as a drug in any country; formal consumer warnings from health agencies (MHRA, Cancer Research UK) |
| Documented serious adverse effects | Priapism, rhabdomyolysis, renal infarction, hypertensive crisis, melanoma cases |
| Route of administration in practice | Subcutaneous injection or nasal spray — without medical oversight, without purity control |
Understand
Overview
Melanotan II (MT-II, MT2) is a synthetic, non-selective melanocortin receptor agonist, originally developed in the 1980s at the University of Arizona as a potential anti-skin-cancer agent through induced skin darkening (tanning) without UV exposure. The original research goal — skin cancer protection in very fair-skinned people via increased natural melanin-based photoprotection — never led to drug registration for MT-II itself. Instead, in the latter half of the 2000s the substance appeared on the online market as an illegal, unapproved "self-tanning" agent, sold via subcutaneous injection with no medical oversight whatsoever.
This is a fundamentally different situation from the related molecule afamelanotide (Melanotan I, trade name Scenesse), which went through full drug registration and is an FDA- and EMA-approved treatment for erythropoietic protoporphyria, a rare genetic disease causing extreme skin light sensitivity. Afamelanotide is a selective MC1R agonist, delivered via an implanted device under strict dermatological supervision for a specific medical indication. Melanotan II has none of this: it's a non-selective agonist acting simultaneously on MC1, MC3, MC4, and MC5 receptors, which explains the broad, often unpredictable range of its side effects extending far beyond simple skin darkening — including effects on appetite, libido, and sexual function mediated by the MC4R receptor in the central nervous system.
This non-selectivity is the key to understanding why Melanotan II deserves particular caution compared with other peptides covered in this category. While BPC-157 or TB-500 mainly have a problem of lacking effectiveness evidence, Melanotan II has the opposite, more serious problem: solid, repeatedly confirmed documentation across independent publications of real, sometimes severe adverse effects, including acute complications requiring surgical intervention (priapism) and, particularly concerning given its mechanism of action, documented melanoma cases in users.
The first Phase I pilot study in humans, conducted in 1996 on three healthy men receiving escalating subcutaneous doses of MT-II, confirmed dose-dependent skin darkening, but even in this tiny study researchers noted nausea, facial flushing, and — notably, since this was not expected while developing the drug as an anti-cancer agent — spontaneous penile erections as a side effect. It was precisely this unexpected observation from the first human study that steered some subsequent melanocortin-derivative research toward erectile and sexual dysfunction (from which the approved drug bremelanotide, Vyleesi, used for sexual desire disorders in women, is derived) — but Melanotan II itself never completed clinical development and never obtained registration for any indication.
Regulatory agencies in multiple countries have issued formal consumer warnings about Melanotan II. The UK's Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) received dozens of reports covering dozens of different adverse reactions related to its use, including gastrointestinal, cardiac, blood, and eye problems, while Cancer Research UK and the American Skin Cancer Foundation issued public warnings specifically addressing the oncological risk tied to this substance's mechanism of action. Independent laboratory analyses of vials seized in the UK and Australia have repeatedly found wide variation in actual peptide content relative to the label, frequent bacterial contamination, elevated endotoxin levels, and unidentified peptide impurities — meaning that even the theoretical risk of the pure molecule itself is, in practice, further compounded by a total lack of quality control over the product reaching the consumer.
The group most at risk of encountering Melanotan II are very fair-skinned people seeking an alternative to sun or tanning-bed exposure, parts of the bodybuilding community exploiting its appetite and libido effects as a "bonus," and young people buying the product online without fully grasping that something labeled a "tanning peptide" is not a cosmetic or supplement but an unapproved, injectable compound pharmacologically active throughout the entire body, not just the skin.
History of use
Melanotan II was synthesized in the 1980s in Victor Hruby's lab at the University of Arizona, as part of research into alpha-MSH analogs as potential photoprotective and anti-cancer agents. The first Phase I pilot study in humans (Dorr et al., 1996) confirmed skin-darkening activity but revealed an unexpected side effect — spontaneous erections — which steered subsequent commercial research toward sexual dysfunction rather than tanning. Development rights in that direction were taken up by Palatin Technologies, which eventually led to registration of a different melanocortin analog, bremelanotide (Vyleesi), approved by the FDA in 2019 for sexual desire disorders in women — but not Melanotan II itself. From the mid-2000s, MT-II began circulating in online sales as an illegal "tanning peptide," and from 2007–2009 British and Australian public health agencies began issuing the first formal consumer warnings in response to a growing number of adverse-effect reports.
Mechanism of action
Melanotan II acts as a non-selective agonist of melanocortin receptors — a family of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), labeled MC1R through MC5R, which under the physiological action of the natural hormone alpha-MSH (alpha-melanotropin) regulate a broad range of processes: from skin pigmentation, through appetite control and body weight, sexual response, to modulation of immune and inflammatory response. Alpha-MSH binds with varying affinity to all five receptors, but its physiological action in skin is dominated by MC1R on melanocytes — the epidermis's pigment-producing cells.
Activating MC1R on melanocytes with Melanotan II stimulates the intracellular cyclic AMP (cAMP) pathway, leading to increased tyrosinase enzyme activity and shifting melanin production toward dark, brown-black eumelanin at the expense of red-yellow pheomelanin. This effect is independent of UV radiation exposure, which is the basis of the "sunless tanning" marketing hook, but biologically means forcing maximal melanocyte activity pharmacologically, rather than the skin's natural, controlled response to actual sun exposure.
It's precisely this lack of selectivity toward other melanocortin receptors that distinguishes Melanotan II from the approved afamelanotide and explains its broad adverse-effect profile. Activating MC3R and MC4R in the hypothalamus and other central nervous system structures affects appetite regulation (usually suppressing it) and sexual function — MC4R is the key receptor mediating melanocortins' pro-hedonic and pro-erectile action at the central level, which explains both spontaneous erections and documented priapism cases (a pathologically prolonged, painful erection requiring medical intervention) in MT-II users. Activating MC5R and MC1R outside melanocytes has additional, less understood effects on sebaceous glands and the immune system.
The mechanism of action also has direct oncological significance, which is the main reason this particular peptide requires special caution among all those covered in this category. Melanocytes activated by an MC1R agonist increase proliferation and metabolic activity — physiologically desirable in the context of photoprotection, but theoretically concerning in the context of surveillance over abnormal, potentially pre-cancerous or already cancerously altered melanocytes. Documented melanoma cases in the medical literature among Melanotan II users, while not conclusively proving a causal relationship in every case (UV exposure, which some users additionally pursue to "enhance" the tanning effect, is a significant confounding factor here), are sufficiently numerous and mechanistically consistent with the substance's action to justify real, not merely theoretical, oncological caution.
Binding melanocortin receptors
Melanotan II non-selectively activates MC1R, MC3R, MC4R, and MC5R — unlike natural alpha-MSH and the approved afamelanotide, which act far more selectively.
Melanocyte activation (MC1R)
The cAMP pathway increases tyrosinase activity, shifting pigment production toward dark eumelanin regardless of UV exposure.
Central action (MC4R, MC3R)
Activating hypothalamic receptors affects appetite and sexual function — the mechanism behind spontaneous erections and documented priapism cases.
Theoretical oncological risk
Pharmacologically driving melanocyte proliferation and activity raises legitimate concerns about surveillance of abnormal pigment cells — consistent with documented melanoma cases in users.
Evidence: limited — based on 3 studies in this database.
Benefits
Common myths
MythMelanotan II is a safe way to get a "tan without sun" because it works just like the body's natural hormone.
FactMelanotan II is a non-selective agonist simultaneously activating four different melanocortin receptors, while natural alpha-MSH and the approved drug afamelanotide act far more selectively. This non-selectivity directly causes the broad, sometimes severe adverse-effect profile, including priapism and documented melanoma cases.
MythMelanotan II and afamelanotide (Scenesse) are basically the same approved substance under different names.
FactThese are two different molecules with different receptor selectivity. Afamelanotide is an FDA- and EMA-approved drug for one narrow medical indication (erythropoietic protoporphyria), administered under strict supervision. Melanotan II has never obtained any registration and is sold exclusively through unregulated online commerce.
MythSince nasal spray doesn't require injection, it's safer than the injectable form.
FactAn oral mucosal melanoma case has been documented tied specifically to nasal use of Melanotan II, which doesn't confirm lower risk for this route — the substance acts throughout the body regardless of administration route.
MythPriapism after Melanotan II is rare and not worth worrying about.
FactMultiple, independently documented priapism cases requiring medical intervention, including surgical decompression, have been described after Melanotan II use — this is a serious, potentially irreversible urological complication, not a mild, transient side effect.
MythExtra tanning bed or sun exposure after Melanotan II is safe, since the substance already "prepared" the skin.
FactCombining pharmacological melanocyte stimulation with actual UV exposure stacks the two effects rather than neutralizing them — the theoretical oncological risk of both factors is more likely to add up than cancel out.
MythProducts sold as "pure Melanotan II" from reputable online vendors are safe in terms of quality.
FactIndependent lab analyses of vials seized in the UK and Australia have repeatedly found wide variation in actual peptide content, bacterial contamination, and elevated endotoxin levels regardless of a seller's claimed reputation — none of these products undergo the independent quality control required of drugs.
Forms & variants
Melanotan II comes in several forms that differ in bioavailability and use case — the form you pick genuinely matters for how effective the supplementation is.
Subcutaneous injection
The most common gray-market form — self-injecting lyophilized powder dissolved in bacteriostatic water, with no medical oversight and no sterility guarantee.
Best for: Our editorial team does not recommend any form of using this substance
Nasal spray
An alternative route promoted as "less invasive" than injection — but with at least one documented oral mucosal melanoma case tied to exactly this form, which doesn't confirm lower risk.
Best for: Our editorial team does not recommend any form of using this substance
Afamelanotide (Scenesse) — a separate, approved drug
A selective MC1R agonist delivered via implanted device, approved by the FDA and EMA exclusively for erythropoietic protoporphyria, under strict dermatological supervision. This is not Melanotan II and is not available for cosmetic use.
Best for: Only patients diagnosed with erythropoietic protoporphyria, under specialist care — not applicable to "tanning" use
Check your profile
Not sure which supplements actually make sense for you?
Answer a few short questions about your lifestyle, diet, sleep, and goals. VitMode will build your profile and show supplements worth considering — with reasoning and evidence strength.
Recommendations take your answers and the strength of the scientific evidence into account. A supplement's popularity has no bearing on whether it gets recommended.
Practice
Frequently asked questions
Afamelanotide is a selective MC1R agonist, approved by the FDA and EMA exclusively for erythropoietic protoporphyria, delivered via an implanted device under dermatologist supervision. Melanotan II is a non-selective agonist activating four different melanocortin receptors simultaneously, never registered as a drug, sold exclusively through unregulated online commerce — a completely different safety profile.
The medical literature has documented multiple, independent melanoma cases in Melanotan II users, including one oral mucosal melanoma case after nasal spray use. The substance's mechanism of action (pharmacologically driven melanocyte proliferation) is consistent with this risk, though individual clinical case reports don't prove a definitive causal relationship in every situation — additional UV exposure in some users is a confounding factor.
Priapism is a pathologically prolonged, painful erection unrelated to sexual arousal, requiring urgent medical intervention, often surgical. Melanotan II activates the MC4R receptor in the central nervous system, which mediates the erectile response — multiple priapism cases have been documented after its use, some requiring surgical decompression.
It is not registered as a drug or approved as a dietary supplement or cosmetic in Poland or the EU. Sale and use occur outside any drug regulation, and numerous European public health agencies have issued formal consumer warnings about this substance.
There's no evidence for this — the substance acts throughout the body regardless of administration route, and an oral mucosal melanoma case has been documented tied specifically to nasal use. Changing the route of administration doesn't eliminate the mechanism of action on melanocortin receptors throughout the body.
There's no independent way for a consumer to verify such claims. Independent lab analyses of vials from the online market have repeatedly found discrepancies between label and actual content, plus bacterial contamination, regardless of a seller's marketing claims — no product from this market undergoes independent, mandatory quality control.
None has been established in any clinical trial assessing long-term safety in humans. The only Phase I study (1996) covered three healthy men, and even in that minimal sample, significant adverse effects were noted — no larger, controlled study exists on which any dosing recommendation could be based.
Dosage & timing
Typical dose
No approved, safe dosing guidelines exist for humans. Protocols found on internet forums (around 0.25–1 mg per injection, several times weekly, until visible tanning) are anecdotal practices never verified by any long-term safety clinical trial.
Form
In online commerce: lyophilized powder for subcutaneous injection or nasal spray — with no standardization of purity or concentration between vendors
Dosing information reflects ranges reported in cited studies and online use for informational purposes only — it does not replace consultation with a doctor or pharmacist.
Best times to take it
- No studied, safe time-based administration schedules exist for humans — any "protocols" found online are informal, unapproved, and unverified for safety
What to combine with
Use caution with
TB-500 — No interaction studies exist whatsoever — combining unapproved peptides with different mechanisms compounds total, unstudied risk
Safety
Side effects & contraindications
Possible side effects
Nausea, abdominal pain, and stomach cramps — one of the most commonly reported effects, especially early in use
Facial flushing and dizziness
Spontaneous penile erections, in documented cases progressing to priapism requiring surgical intervention (cavernosal aspiration or penoscrotal decompression)
Documented melanoma cases, including oral mucosal melanoma after nasal spray use, in MT-II users
Rhabdomyolysis and acute kidney injury (including renal infarction) — described in isolated but serious clinical case reports
Exogenous hypercortisolism described in case report literature
Appetite loss and severe constipation with longer use
Gray-market product contamination — bacterial endotoxins, mismatch between declared and actual vial content
Contraindications
History of melanoma, numerous atypical moles, or high skin cancer risk — an absolute contraindication given the mechanism directly stimulating melanocytes
Cardiovascular disease, including uncontrolled hypertension — given documented cases of hypertensive crisis and cardiovascular strain
Pregnancy and breastfeeding — no safety data of any kind; the substance acts centrally and hormonally
Kidney disease — given documented cases of acute kidney injury and renal infarction associated with use
All potential users — given the lack of registration, lack of quality control, and documented serious adverse effects, our editorial team does not identify a group for whom use of this substance can be reasonably recommended
Interactions
Blood pressure medications — theoretical, not systematically studied interaction risk given documented hypertensive crisis cases
Other substances affecting sexual function (e.g. PDE5 inhibitors) — theoretically increased risk of prolonged erection/priapism when combined
UV exposure (tanning beds, sun) to "enhance" the tanning effect — additionally stacks on top of the substance's already elevated theoretical oncological risk
Alcohol and other kidney-straining substances — theoretically increased risk given documented kidney injury cases
Is it worth taking?
Who it's for
- From an editorial standpoint: no group has been identified for whom Melanotan II use can be honestly recommended given current evidence and the lack of market regulation
- Very fair-skinned people seeking sun protection should consider approved photoprotection methods (UV filters, protective clothing, regular dermatoscopic mole checks) instead of an unapproved peptide
- Anyone who nonetheless decides to use it should at least consider regular dermatoscopic skin mole checks with a dermatologist, given documented melanoma cases in users
Not for
- History of melanoma, numerous atypical moles, or high skin cancer risk — an absolute contraindication given the mechanism directly stimulating melanocytes
- Cardiovascular disease, including uncontrolled hypertension — given documented cases of hypertensive crisis and cardiovascular strain
- Pregnancy and breastfeeding — no safety data of any kind; the substance acts centrally and hormonally
- Kidney disease — given documented cases of acute kidney injury and renal infarction associated with use
- All potential users — given the lack of registration, lack of quality control, and documented serious adverse effects, our editorial team does not identify a group for whom use of this substance can be reasonably recommended
Evidence
Worth knowing
Melanotan II has never obtained drug registration in any country and is not a legal dietary supplement or cosmetic.
A related but distinct drug — afamelanotide (Scenesse) — is approved only for erythropoietic protoporphyria, under strict dermatological supervision.
The UK's MHRA received dozens of reports covering dozens of different adverse reactions linked to Melanotan II use.
Melanoma cases, including oral mucosal melanoma, have been documented repeatedly and independently in users of this substance.
Studies
Reported adverse effects include nausea, abdominal pain, anxiety, flushing, dizziness, headaches, appetite loss, stomach cramps, severe constipation, spontaneous penile erections, muscle pain, and induction of skin cancers.
Review of Melanotan II clinical case reports, dermatology and urology literature 2012–2026
Evaluation of melanotan-II, a superpotent cyclic melanotropic peptide in a pilot phase-I clinical study
Early-stage evidenceDorr RT, Lines R, Levine N, Brooks C, Xiang L, Hruby VJ, Hadley ME · Life Sciences · 1996
A pilot Phase I study in three healthy men receiving escalating subcutaneous doses of Melanotan II. Dose-dependent skin darkening was confirmed, but significant adverse effects were noted: nausea, facial flushing, and unexpected spontaneous penile erections — an observation that steered further clinical development of melanocortin analogs toward sexual dysfunction rather than tanning.
View studyMelanotan Tanning Injection: A Rare Cause of Priapism
Early-stage evidenceMallory JP, Lopategui DM, Cordon BH · Sexual Medicine · 2021
A case report of a patient with acute ischemic priapism after subcutaneous Melanotan II injection, unresponsive to conservative management (cavernosal aspiration and irrigation, phenylephrine injection), who ultimately required surgical penoscrotal decompression.
View studyMelanotan II nasal spray: a possible risk factor for oral mucosal malignant melanoma?
Research hypothesisCase report authors · Clinical journal (case report) · 2026
A case report of a patient using nasal spray Melanotan II before tanning-bed sessions, who developed oral mucosal melanoma. The authors hypothesize a possible link between exposure to the substance (including via the nasal route, not only injection) and oncological risk within mucous membranes, while noting that concurrent UV exposure from tanning beds is a significant confounding factor in this single case report.
View studySources & bibliography
- MHRA (UK) — consumer warning on Melanotan
- Cancer Research UK — warning on Melanotan injections
- The Skin Cancer Foundation — warning on Melanotan II
Citations are illustrative for this demo version and require full bibliographic verification by the editorial team before production publication.
Compare with similar entries
About the authors of this entry
Author
dr Anna KowalczykEditor-in-Chief, Molecular Biology
Anna studied molecular biology at the University of Warsaw, then spent eight years after her PhD in a lab researching the mechanisms of cellular aging and autophagy. She stumbled into science journalism almost by accident — frustrated by how easily her field's findings get oversimplified in the media, she started a blog explaining the biology of aging in plain language. That blog became the seed of VitMode. Today Anna oversees the entire editorial process, holding every piece to the same rigor her old lab demanded: primary sources, methodology checks, and honesty about the limits of the evidence. Outside work, she's a dedicated boulderer.
196 publications on this site
Medical review
dr Piotr ZielińskiEndocrinologist
Piotr has practiced endocrinology for more than fifteen years, mostly in male hormonal disorders and metabolic health. He joined VitMode as a scientific consultant because, as he jokes, he got tired of explaining the same testosterone questions at every appointment and decided to write the answers down properly, once. He reviews content on hormone therapy, supplement pharmacology and drug interactions, making sure articles never turn into encouragement to self-supplement in situations that genuinely need diagnostics and medical supervision. His professional motto — "evidence first, enthusiasm second" — has come up more than once with a patient who arrived with a supplement plan they found online.
268 publications on this site
Related entries
3.9TB-500
TB-500 circulates online as a "synthetic fragment of thymosin beta-4" supposedly speeding up healing of tendons, ligaments, and muscle — in practice, a marketing name for a poorly defined substance with not a single published human clinical trial behind it.
4.1GHK-Cu (Copper Peptide)
GHK-Cu is a naturally occurring copper tripeptide with one of the longest and best-documented track records in this category for topical skin use — but that solid cosmetic reputation is often groundlessly extended to injectable, systemic use, for which human evidence is practically nonexistent.
4.3Collagen
Collagen peptides are often used as a supportive measure for skin elasticity and joint comfort — the evidence is promising but still limited.
4.4Heart Rate Variability (HRV)
The variability in the time between successive heartbeats is one of the best non-invasive indicators of autonomic nervous system balance — today available in nearly every sports watch.
4.2What is biohacking
From the DIY-biology movement through the Quantified Self to today's social-media-popular trend — what biohacking actually is in practice, and where science ends and marketing begins.
4.2Red Light Therapy (Photobiomodulation)
Exposure to red and near-infrared light has become a popular biohacking tool — with real, though still limited, evidence mainly in the context of skin health.
Related articles
PoradnikiPeptide Therapy: Overview and Safety — What's a Drug, and What's a Gray Market
"Peptides" has become a catch-all buzzword in biohacking covering both real, FDA-approved drugs and hundreds of substances sold online as "research use only" — with no oversight of quality, sterility, or dosing. This article pulls the two apart: we check which peptides actually made it through drug approval, which are circulating in a legal gray zone, and what real risk comes with the second group.
September 16, 2026
PoradnikiBPC-157: What Is Actually Known About the "Regenerative Peptide" — and What Isn't
BPC-157 is often described online as a near-miraculous peptide for tendon, ligament, and joint injuries — regenerating tissue where other methods fail. The problem is that almost this entire reputation rests on rodent studies. Clinical data in humans is extremely limited, the substance isn't approved by any drug agency, and in many countries it's sold in a legal gray area as a "research compound" rather than a drug or supplement. This article is deliberately skeptical — because the evidence that actually exists deserves skepticism.
September 4, 2026
PoradnikiIpamorelin vs CJC-1295: How These Two Growth-Hormone Peptides Differ
Ipamorelin and CJC-1295 are the two most commonly stacked peptides in biohacking said to stimulate growth hormone release — but they act on completely different receptors, have dramatically different half-lives, and rest on different quality evidence. This article breaks both substances down: what human studies actually confirm, what's pure extrapolation, and why the popular practice of stacking both together is a hypothesis, not an established clinical practice.
October 5, 2026
PoradnikiBPC-157 and TB-500 Together: Does Stacking These Peptides Make Scientific Sense?
The "Wolverine stack" — combining BPC-157 and TB-500 in a single regenerative protocol — is one of the most popular "combos" in peptide biohacking. Marketing presents it as a natural complement: one peptide works locally, the other systemically. The problem is that neither peptide, alone or especially together, has a single human clinical trial behind it — and the theory about their mutual reinforcement is a hypothesis drawn from separate rat studies, not the result of a comparative trial.
October 5, 2026
Comments (2)
- KW
Kasia W. 2 weeks ago
Very clearly explained, especially the interactions section — I hadn't seen it laid out this well anywhere else.
- MT
Marek T. a month ago
Are you planning to update this with the newest study from this year? I saw an interesting meta-analysis.
