Tool
Supplement comparison tool
Pick up to 4 knowledge base entries and compare their dosage, price, evidence strength and ratings side by side — you can save or share a link to your selection.
Add to comparison (2/4)
| Category | Biohacking | Biohacking |
| Evidence strength | Research hypothesis | Early-stage evidence |
| Evidence Score | 1/5 | 2/5 |
| User rating | 3.9 (58) | 4.2 (59) |
| Typical dose | No approved, clinically evidence-based dosing guidelines for humans exist. Protocols found on internet forums (typically around 2–2.5 mg twice weekly) are extrapolations from anecdotal practice and doses used in animal studies, not findings supported by human pharmacokinetic research. | Not applicable — the term describes a methodological approach, not a specific intervention with a dose |
| Form | In online commerce: lyophilized powder for self-dissolution and subcutaneous injection — with no standardization of purity or concentration between vendors | Covers a broad spectrum of practices, from lifestyle changes to supplementation and monitoring devices |
| Average price | ok. 150–400 zł za fiolkę 2–5 mg w nieregulowanej sprzedaży internetowej | — |
| Monthly cost | ok. 300–800 zł/miesiąc przy typowych protokołach stosowanych przez użytkowników forów | — |
| Time to effects | Not established in human clinical trials — "time to effect" figures quoted on forums (usually 2–6 weeks) are anecdotal reports unsupported by objective measurement or a control group. | Not applicable — depends entirely on the specific intervention implemented. |
| Who it's for | From an editorial standpoint: no group currently exists for whom TB-500 use can honestly be recommended given the current state of evidence | People wanting to systematically, based on data and research, optimize their health |