VitMode

Beetroot Nitrates and Blood Pressure — What Does the Meta-Analysis Show?

Beetroot juice is often recommended as a natural way to lower blood pressure — thanks to its naturally high content of inorganic nitrates, which the body converts into nitric oxide, a potent vasodilator. A meta-analysis of 16 small crossover trials does show a statistically significant drop in systolic blood pressure, but the mechanism itself is more complex and dependent on individual factors than the headlines suggest — and most of the trials covered very short intervention periods.

PZdr Piotr ZielińskiAugust 27, 202611 min read
Table of contents

Beetroot as a "natural blood pressure remedy" — where this reputation comes from

Beetroot juice and beets as a vegetable have, on the internet and in parts of nutrition advice, the reputation of an almost miraculous natural blood-pressure lowering remedy. This reputation didn't come out of nowhere — beets, like arugula, spinach, or lettuce, belong to a group of vegetables exceptionally rich in inorganic nitrates (NO3-), compounds the body can convert into nitric oxide, a molecule with strong vasodilating action. This is a real, physiologically described biochemical pathway, not just a folk belief.

The question, however, is how large this effect actually is in practice, in whom it works best, and whether the data behind this reputation actually justify treating beets as an intervention comparable to the lifestyle changes described in our entry on hypertension, such as sodium reduction or the DASH diet. In this article we rely on one specific meta-analysis, the first to systematically compile available clinical trials on this topic.

The nitrate–nitrite–nitric oxide pathway: how it actually works

Inorganic nitrates from food (highest in beets, but also in green leafy vegetables) are absorbed in the digestive tract and enter the bloodstream, from where part of them is actively taken up by the salivary glands and secreted back into the mouth along with saliva. This is a key, counterintuitive element of this mechanism: the further conversion of nitrates doesn't happen in the intestines, but on the surface of the tongue.

Anaerobic bacteria naturally living on the back of the tongue reduce nitrates to nitrites (NO2-) through an anaerobic fermentation process. Once swallowed again, nitrites are then converted, in the acidic environment of the stomach and in body tissues, into nitric oxide (NO) — the same signaling molecule that dilates blood vessels by relaxing the smooth muscles of their walls, lowering vascular resistance and, as a result, blood pressure. This is a pathway independent of the classic route of NO synthesis from the amino acid L-arginine via the NOS enzyme, making it a separate, additional mechanism of vascular tone regulation.

Oral bacteria as an essential link

Strong evidence

This stage of reducing nitrates to nitrites by tongue bacteria is well described physiologically and considered an essential, necessary step of the entire pathway — without it, dietary oral nitrates largely fail to translate into increased nitric oxide levels in the body. This matters for understanding why the effectiveness of this intervention may differ between individuals, which we return to in the section on limitations.

What the Siervo and colleagues meta-analysis showed

Inorganic nitrate and beetroot juice supplementation reduces blood pressure in adults

Moderate evidence

Siervo M, Lara J, Ogbonmwan I, Mathers JC · The Journal of Nutrition · 2013

The systematic review and meta-analysis covered 16 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, with a total of 254 participants (from 7 to 30 people per study). Supplementation with inorganic nitrates or beetroot juice lowered systolic blood pressure by an average of 4.4 mmHg (95% CI: -5.9 to -2.8; p<0.001) — a statistically significant effect. Diastolic blood pressure fell by an average of 1.1 mmHg (95% CI: -2.2 to 0.1; p=0.06) — an effect at the borderline of statistical significance, formally non-significant. Meta-regression showed a relationship between the daily nitrate dose and the magnitude of the drop in systolic blood pressure (p<0.05) — the higher the dose, the greater the observed effect.

View study

All 16 studies had a crossover design, and the intervention periods were short — from a single dose observed after 2 hours to a maximum of 15 days of regular use. In other words: this is a meta-analysis of short-term, acute effects, not data from many months or years of supplementation as we know from, for example, statin or antihypertensive drug studies.

The meta-analysis authors themselves explicitly noted in their summary that these results need confirmation in long-term studies and in populations at elevated cardiovascular risk — the groups for which a blood-pressure-lowering intervention would have the greatest practical clinical significance. This is an honest caveat worth keeping in mind whenever extrapolating these results to everyday, long-term use.

4.4 mmHg — is that a lot, or a little?

A drop in systolic blood pressure of 4.4 mmHg sounds modest compared to the effects of some antihypertensive drugs, which can lower pressure by ten or more mmHg. For comparison, though, in population-level epidemiological studies, lowering average systolic blood pressure across a population by even a few mmHg is associated with a measurable reduction in the risk of stroke and coronary heart disease at the population level — so an effect of this magnitude isn't physiologically trivial, even if it won't replace pharmacological treatment for a single individual.

A statistically significant effect on systolic pressure alongside a lack of significance for diastolic pressure is, moreover, a common pattern in studies of vasodilating interventions — it's consistent with the mechanism of action of nitric oxide, which affects large arteries and pulse wave dynamics more strongly than it does peripheral vascular resistance, which corresponds more to the diastolic value.

A dose-response relationship is a strong mechanistic signal

The dose-response relationship shown in the meta-regression, between nitrate dose and the size of the drop in systolic pressure, is a significant argument that the observed effect is real and biologically plausible, not random — in genuine physiological effects, typically the more active substance, the stronger the response, up to a certain saturation point.

Why the effect can vary between individuals

Since the key, necessary step of the entire pathway is the reduction of nitrates to nitrites by anaerobic bacteria on the tongue, the logical consequence is that the composition and activity of a given person's oral microbiome can meaningfully affect how much nitric oxide is ultimately produced from the same dose of dietary nitrates. This is still an area of active research, but mechanistically it's a plausible explanation for why some people report a more pronounced effect from beets than others at seemingly the same dose.

For the same reason, observations appear in the literature that regular use of strongly antibacterial mouthwashes may weaken this pathway, since they eliminate the tongue bacteria responsible for reducing nitrates to nitrites. This is an interesting but still insufficiently quantified aspect of the topic — we don't currently have reliable, precise figures indicating exactly how much an antibacterial mouthwash reduces the hypotensive effect of nitrates in an average person, so we limit ourselves here to a general, honest statement of the direction of this relationship, without providing made-up percentage figures.

What this meta-analysis does not prove

All 16 studies had a short, in most cases very short, duration (from 2 hours to 15 days) and a crossover design with a small number of participants per study (7-30 people). This is well suited to demonstrating an acute physiological effect, but it doesn't prove that regular, long-term consumption of beets or beetroot juice will maintain the same drop in blood pressure over time, nor that it translates into hard endpoints such as fewer strokes or heart attacks. The meta-analysis authors themselves pointed to the need for long-term studies in higher cardiovascular-risk populations — according to the data available to us, these studies are still needed.

Myths and facts about beets and blood pressure

Myth

Since studies show a statistically significant drop in blood pressure, beetroot juice can replace medication for hypertension.

Fact

The effect shown in the meta-analysis (4.4 mmHg for systolic pressure) is real, but many times smaller than the typical effect of antihypertensive drugs, and the data come from short-term crossover studies, not long-term use. Beetroot nitrates can be a reasonable dietary addition, but not a substitute for prescribed pharmacological treatment of hypertension.

A second common myth concerns the mechanism itself: some messaging suggests that the "beet" as a vegetable itself has magical properties, when in reality it's a specific, measurable chemical compound — inorganic nitrates — also present in other vegetables, though less often at as high a concentration as in beets and beetroot juice.

What's worth doing in practice

Practical takeaways for people considering beets as part of a blood-pressure-lowering diet

  • Beets and beetroot juice can be a reasonable, additional element of a diet supporting healthy blood pressure, alongside already well-documented interventions like sodium reduction or the DASH diet
  • Never stop or reduce the dose of prescribed antihypertensive medication on your own based solely on dietary nitrate supplementation — the decision to change treatment belongs solely to the treating doctor
  • People who regularly use strongly antibacterial mouthwashes may theoretically weaken this specific biochemical pathway — this isn't a reason to abandon oral hygiene, but it's worth keeping this relationship in mind
  • The effect is short-lived and best documented after a single or short-term dose — regular, daily consumption seems a more sensible approach than a one-off, occasional reach for beetroot juice right before a blood pressure reading
  • People with oxalate kidney stones or other dietary contraindications should discuss increasing beet consumption with a doctor, since this vegetable also contains oxalates

Beetroot nitrates and blood pressure — summary

QuestionShort answer
Do beetroot nitrates lower blood pressure?Yes, in a meta-analysis of 16 studies (254 people) systolic pressure dropped significantly by 4.4 mmHg
Does the effect also apply to diastolic pressure?The 1.1 mmHg drop was at the borderline of statistical significance (p=0.06) — an uncertain effect
Does this replace antihypertensive medication?No — the effect is much smaller than the typical action of drugs, and the studies were short-term
How does the mechanism work?Nitrates are reduced to nitrites by bacteria on the tongue, then converted to vasodilating nitric oxide
Will everyone get the same effect?Probably not — effectiveness depends on the oral microbiome, which is essential for nitrate conversion

Beetroot nitrates and blood pressure at a glance

Our editorial recommendation

The Siervo and colleagues meta-analysis is a solid, systematic summary of the crossover studies available at the time of its publication, and it shows a real, measurable effect of beetroot nitrates on systolic blood pressure. At the same time, an honest presentation of this topic requires noting that we're talking about short-term, acute effects from small studies, not evidence of durable, long-term blood pressure control comparable to pharmacotherapy or to the best-documented lifestyle changes.

We treat beets and beetroot juice as a sensible addition, grounded in a real physiological mechanism, to a diet supporting healthy blood pressure — not as a replacement for treatment. For people with diagnosed hypertension, the most important advice remains the same: consult a doctor, measure blood pressure regularly, and stick to the prescribed treatment, with dietary interventions of this kind as a supplement, not an alternative.

I really like this meta-analysis because it shows something rather rare in lifestyle medicine: a specific number, a specific mechanism, and an honest caveat from the authors that more data are needed. That's exactly the level of certainty worth communicating to patients — neither enthusiastic exaggeration nor dismissing the topic entirely.

Dr. Piotr Zieliński, VitMode editorial team

Frequently asked questions

The Siervo and colleagues meta-analysis covered studies with varying doses and showed a dose-response relationship for systolic pressure — the higher the nitrate dose, the greater the observed drop. The meta-analysis itself doesn't give a single, universal recommended dose for everyone, since the studies differed in protocol, so the decision on amount is better based on generally, regularly including beets in the diet than on trying to reproduce the exact dose from a single study.

The Siervo and colleagues meta-analysis didn't directly compare different beet cooking methods, so we don't have a numerical answer to this question from this specific source. In general, nitrates are water-soluble compounds and partly sensitive to high temperatures, which is why raw beetroot juice tends to be used more often in studies of this mechanism than beets boiled for a long time in a large amount of water.

The pathway converting nitrates into nitric oxide requires anaerobic bacteria on the tongue that reduce nitrates to nitrites — this is a well-described, necessary step of the mechanism. Strongly antibacterial mouthwashes could theoretically reduce the population of these bacteria, and thereby weaken this pathway, though we don't have precise figures from this specific meta-analysis on the scale of this effect — it's more a mechanistically justified direction of the relationship than a fully quantified result.

Beets as a vegetable are safe for most people taking antihypertensive drugs, but any significant dietary change or considered supplementation is worth discussing with the treating doctor, especially when using several blood-pressure-lowering medications at once, to avoid an excessive, uncontrolled drop in blood pressure (hypotension).

In the meta-analysis, the drop in diastolic pressure (1.1 mmHg) was at the borderline of statistical significance (p=0.06), while the drop in systolic pressure (4.4 mmHg) was clearly significant (p<0.001). This pattern is consistent with the mechanism of action of nitric oxide, which more strongly affects large arteries and the pulse wave corresponding more to the systolic value, than the peripheral vascular resistance more strongly linked to the diastolic value.

The Siervo and colleagues meta-analysis included various forms of nitrate supplementation, including beetroot juice and inorganic nitrate supplements, so the general mechanism and direction of the effect should be similar. What matters most is the actual nitrate content of a given product rather than the form (juice, capsule, powder) itself — and that content can vary between manufacturers and isn't always clearly stated on the label.

We don't know this precisely from this meta-analysis — all 16 included studies lasted from 2 hours to a maximum of 15 days, and the authors themselves pointed to the need for long-term studies. There's no basis to assume the effect fades with longer use, but there's also no solid data yet from multi-year studies that would clearly confirm this.

Sources

PZ

dr Piotr Zieliński

Specialist physician in endocrinology, scientific consultant

Piotr reviews content on hormones, metabolic health and supplement pharmacology.

Related articles

Related knowledge base entries

Comments (2)

  • KW

    Kasia W. 2 weeks ago

    Very clearly explained, especially the interactions section — I hadn't seen it laid out this well anywhere else.

  • MT

    Marek T. a month ago

    Are you planning to update this with the newest study from this year? I saw an interesting meta-analysis.